A class action says Carrington Mortgage Services has charged improper 'pay-to-pay' fees for payments made online or by phone.
Defendant(s) CategoriesNew to ClassAction.org? Read our Newswire Disclaimer
A Florida consumer claims in a proposed class action lawsuit that Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC charges unlawful fees for mortgage payments made online or over the phone.
The lawsuit alleges that Carrington, one of the largest residential mortgage servicers in the U.S., charges homeowners $5.00 for each online mortgage payment and $10.00 to $20.00 for payments made by phone. According to the case, these “pay-to-pay” fees violate both consumers’ mortgage agreements and Florida debt collection law.
Per the lawsuit, Carrington is permitted under homeowners’ mortgage agreements to pass on to borrowers only the exact amounts it incurs for certain servicing activities. According to the case, Carrington pays non-party Western Union to operate Quick Pay, an automated online and telephone payment processing system for which the financial firm charges the defendant about $0.50 or less per transaction. Despite incurring out-of-pocket expenses amounting to “only a few cents per transaction,” Carrington marks up the processing fees charged to borrowers for online and phone payments in direct violation of their mortgage agreements, the lawsuit alleges.
The case goes on to claim that as a Federal Housing Association-approved mortgage servicer, Carrington agreed to charge borrowers only fees permitted by the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development. Per the lawsuit, pay-to-pay fees are not included in HUD’s “exhaustive list” of authorized servicing fees and charges. Moreover, HUD specifically prohibits mortgage servicers from charging borrowers for “costs of telephone calls, telegrams, personal visits with the Borrower, certified mail, or other activities that are normally considered a part of a prudent Mortgagee’s servicing activity,” the suit continues.
The lawsuit alleges violations of Florida’s Consumer Collection Practices Act and Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act, as well as breach of contract and unjust enrichment.
Get class action news sent to your inbox – sign up for ClassAction.org’s newsletter here.
Case SpotlightWomen who developed ovarian or uterine cancer after using hair relaxers such as Dark & Lovely and Motions may now have an opportunity to take legal action.
Did you know there's usually nothing you need to do to join, sign up for, or add your name to new class action lawsuits when they're initially filed?
New cases and investigations, settlement deadlines, and news straight to your inbox.
Share Last Updated on May 22, 2020 — 4:22 PM
Erin works primarily on ClassAction.org’s newswire, reporting on cases as they happen.
ClassAction.org is a group of online professionals (designers, developers and writers) with years of experience in the legal industry.
Before commenting, please review our comment policy.
